Saturday, 20 December 2014

Two POLICE MEN ‘Assassinated’ in Brooklyn

Matthew Narvin/The Daily Beast

A FRAYING LINE

12.20.14

Two Cops ‘Assassinated’ in Brooklyn

The execution of two police officers in cold blood has shocked the city and driven a deeper wedge between the cops and the mayor.
In a crime sure to shock all decent souls and to shame those protesters who were chanting for dead cops a week ago, a gunman walked up to a marked NYPD car on Saturday afternoon and shot two uniformed police officers, killing both.
“Five days before Christmas,” a senior law enforcement official noted.
From a shooting stance by the passenger side window, 28-year-old Ishmael Brinsley repeatedly fired a silver Taurus semi-automatic pistol. The bullets struck Officer Rafael Ramos and Officer Wenjian Liu in the head as they sat in their patrol car parked near the corner of Tompkins and Myrtle Avenues. Ramos had been at the wheel. They had no opportunity to draw their guns and may not have even realized the gunman was there.
141220-daly-brooklyn-officers-embed
Police Officer Wenjian Liu, left, and Police Officer Rafael Ramos. (NYPD)
Brinsley then fled into a subway station a block away. Other cops chased him down onto the westbound platform.
“Get down! Get down!” a cop shouted to the waiting passengers.
A shot rang out as Brinsley took his own life, sprawling with the gun at his side. He had shot and wounded his ex-girlfriend early that morning in Baltimore and headed for his native Brooklyn. He was SAID to have paused to post photo of what was almost certainly the same silver Taurus semi-automatic pistol on Instagram, along with these words:
141220-bedstuy-shooting-embed2
Instagram
“I’m Putting Wings on Pigs Today. They take 1 of Ours…Let’s Take 2 of Theirs #ShootThe Police #RIPErivGardner (sic) #RIPMikeBrown This May Be My Final Post…I’m Putting Pigs In A Blanket.”
At least some people had seen the posting and failed to notify the authorities, hopefully because they had not taken it seriously. Ramos and Liu were now rushed to nearby Woodhull Hospital, where one was pronounced dead. The other officer also proved to be beyond saving.
Both Mayor De Blasio and Police Commissioner William Bratton rushed to the hospital. They there met the families of the murdered officers. Liu had been married just two months before and his wife now stood in this Brooklyn hospital, a sudden widow because of a madman. Ramos’ 13-year-old son stood nearby, suddenly without a father.
A senior law enforcement official suggested one early lesson from the tragedy.
“You start shouting ‘shoot cops!’ and some nut might listen to you,” he said.
On December 15, some of the protesters demonstrating in Manhattan against the failure of grand juries in Staten Island and Missouri to indict police officers in the deaths of Eric Garner and Michael Brown were videotaped chanting, “What do we want!? Dead Cops!” Thousands of others chanted, “How do you spell murder? NYPD!” 
The message was that all cops should be condemned by the actions of the very few, and that is just the sort of fevered ignorance that incites violence in those who find meaning in nothing else. Brinsley had apparently not even been in New York that weekend, but he certainly shared that way of thinking and took it to an extreme. 
Around 10:30 a.m. on Saturday, Brinsley posted on his Facebook page that, “I Always Wanted To Be Known For Doing Something Right... But My Past Is Stalking Me And My Present Is Haunting Me.”
He had by that point shot his ex-girlfriend and he had to know the police were looking for him.
141220-bedstuy-shooting-embed3
Facebook
By mid-afternoon he had apparently decided to escape his past and present by striding up to a radio car as a self-imagined avenger. He shot the two officers just about the time the NYPD receiving an alert from the Baltimore police saying that Brinsley was wanted for a shooting and may be in Brooklyn.   
After the demonstrations, the Patrolman’s Benevolent Association, the police union, had blasted the mayor for supporting the protestors at the expense of the cops. The PBA president. Patrick Lynch, had said that De Blasio should stay away from the funerals of any police officers killed in the line of duty.
“They were quite simple assassinated. Targeted for their uniform.”
Now there would be two funerals and police officers turned their backs on De Blasio as he strode with Bratton towards an evening press conference in the hospital auditorium. They were not likely to be appeased by the remarks De Blasio would make to the assembled media about the sacrifices cops make in protecting all of us.
Bratton noted that the murdered officers were posted outside their usual precinct in downtown Brooklyn to help reduce violence in the Tompkins Houses in Bedford Stuyvesant, as part of the ongoing effort that has made New York the safest big city in America. He added that the officers were murdered not because of who they were but what they were.
“They were quite simply assassinated,” Bratton said. “Targeted for their uniform.”
Police had heard that the killer may have had ties to a prison gang called the Black Guerilla Family, which was said by an anonymous caller to 911 in Baltimore to be planning to kill cops, though the caller had not mentioned the death of Garner or Brown. Bratton was not ready to say that Brinsley was acting as part of a group or as anything but a lone monster.
Bratton did note that this was the seventh time since 1972 that a pair of NYPD partners had been murdered. He went on to say that even such double horrors had never kept cops from continuing on.
“They grieve and they mourn but then they go out into the streets of the city to protect us every day and every night,” Bratton said. “It’s not easy. It’s not easy at all.”
He said that the NYPD will be in deepest mourning this Christmas season.
“But they’ll go out and they’ll do what we expect of them because that's what cops do,” he went on.
He then said again, “But it’s not easy.

Idris Elba For the Next James Bond ????

Michael Buckner

SHAKEN, NOT STIRRED

12.19.14

Exclusive: Sony Emails Reveal Studio Head Wants Idris Elba For the Next James Bond

Leaked emails show Sony Pictures Entertainment co-chairman Amy Pascal confessing that the dashing Elba should be 007.
During a particularly droll year-end press conference on Friday, President Obama channeled his inner Louis C.K., entertaining a horde of reporters on subjects ranging from Congress to Cuba to a hybrid NFLer/actor by the name of "James Flacco."
One of the first questions lobbed at the Commander-in-Chief concerned the Sony hack and subsequent cancellation of The Interview’s film release—a destructive cyber-terror attack on the film studio as supposed retribution for their Kim Jong Un assassination comedy, which FBI officials believe to be the work of North Korea (though cybersecurity experts have their doubts).
“[Sony] suffered significant damage, there were threats against some employees. I am sympathetic to the concerns that they faced,” Obama said. “Having said all that, yes, I think they made a mistake.”
“Idris should be the next bond.”
He added, “We cannot have a society in which some dictator someplace can start imposing censorship here in the United States.”
Plenty of the Sony emails have focused on Sony’s prized horse—the James Bond franchise, including the 24th Bond flick Spectre, scheduled to hit theaters on November 6, 2015. Reports have indicated that the script has leaked, the film’s budget ballooned to over $300 million, and that it may feature Blofeld as the villain.
For years, there’s been a lot of online chatter suggesting that Idris Elba, the suave British actor, should be the next James Bond—making him the first black 007.
Current superspy Daniel Craig has even voiced his desire to vacate the post, telling Rolling Stone in 2012, “I've been trying to get out of this from the very moment I got into it. But they won't let me go, and I've agreed to do a couple more, but let's see how this one does, because business is business and if the shit goes down, I've got a contract that somebody will happily wipe their ass with.” Craig is signed on for just one more Bond flick after Spectre.

Thursday, 18 December 2014

British Citizens Can Bring Non-EU family Members Into The UK Without A Travel Visa

The European Court of Justice has ruled British citizens should be able to bring non-EU family members into the UK without a travel visa.
It means the UK's borders could be open to large numbers of foreign migrants from outside the European Union, and will intensify pressure on David Cameron to tackle freedom of movement rules.
The landmark ruling centres on the case of Sean McCarthy, who has dual British and Irish citizenship, and his Colombian wife Patricia McCarthy Rodriguez.
Mrs McCarthy Rodriguez, who has two children with her husband - both with British citizenship, had to get a "family permit" every six months to visit the UK with her family.
She and her husband took their case to court under the freedom of movement rules claiming she should be able to travel without the visa because she had an EU Residence Card issued by the Spanish government.
The European court has now ruled in the couple's favour, saying the rules did not allow the British government to stop family members entering the country if they did not have a visa.
The Government said it was "disappointed" with the ruling.
The Prime Minister has come under increasing pressure to take on the EU over the impact of freedom of movement rules on immigration.
Last month he announced a block on EU migrants claiming welfare for the first four years after they arrive in the country, suggesting that if the EU blocked the move he would campaign for Britain to leave the union.
Responding to the European ruling, Conservative MEP Timothy Kirkhope, spokesman on justice and home affairs, said: "Of course the UK should have an immigration system which is fair, and does not disadvantage the right of British citizens to be with their family.
"However, we are disappointed with this judgment as we believe that the UK's visa system is both fair and lawful, and does an important job in meeting this country's migration needs.
"Britain will always be best placed to decide and deal with its own immigration needs - not a judge in Luxembourg."
UKIP MEP and spokesman on immigration Steven Woolfe said: "This ruling extends the so-called 'right to free movement' to millions of people from anywhere in the world who don't have citizenship of any country of the EU.
"This is yet more proof that Britain can never take back control of its borders as long as it remains in the European Union."
Ref: Hotmail

Judge throws out teen’s murder conviction

Judge throws out teen’s murder conviction 70 years after his execution

 December 17 at 6:39 PM  
When George Stinney Jr. was executed for the killings of two white girls in 1944, he was so small that the straps of South Carolina’s electric chair didn’t fit him properly, and he had to sit on a book for his electrocution.
Stinney was just 14 years old at the time and became the youngest person put to death in the United States in the 20th century. But Wednesday, 70 years after the fact, Circuit Judge Carmen Mullen tossed out his conviction, which was reached after a trial that didn’t even last a full day and was never appealed. As the Associated Press noted, it took Mullen “nearly four times as long to issue her ruling as it took in 1944 to go from arrest to execution.”
“I can think of no greater injustice,” Mullen wrote in her 29-page order, the AP reported.
Stinney, who was black, was arrested for the beating deaths of two young girls in the segregated town of Alcolu. There wasn’t any physical evidence linking him the crimes, and he wasn’t allowed to see his parents after he was apprehended.
“Given the particularized circumstances of Stinney’s case, I find by a preponderance of the evidence standard, that a violation of the Defendant’s procedural due process rights tainted his prosecution,” Mullen wrote in her decision, according to CNN.
From the AP:
Stinney’s case has long been whispered in civil rights circles in South Carolina as an example of how a black person could be railroaded by a justice system during the Jim Crow era where the investigators, prosecutors and juries were all white.
The case received renewed attention because of a crusade by textile inspector and school board member George Frierson. Armed with a binder full of newspaper articles and other evidence, he and a law firm believed the teen represented everything that was wrong with South Carolina during the era of segregation.
“It was obviously a long shot but one we thought was worth taking,” said attorney Matt Burgess, whose firm argued that Stinney should get a new trial.
Earlier this year, Stinney’s sister, Amie Ruffner told the Guardian: “I never went back [to Alcolu]. I curse that place. It was the destruction of my family and the killing of my brother.”
She will never forget the last time she saw George alive. She was eight at the time, hunkering in the chicken coop, scared half to death, when two black cars drove up to their house. Neither her mother, also Aime, a cook, nor her father, George senior, were home when white law enforcement officers came and took away George and her stepbrother, Johnny, in handcuffs. Johnny was later let go. She idolised George and followed him everywhere. He called her his shadow.
Though she left the south long ago, Aime’s rich, deep voice resonates with the vowels of her birthplace. But recalling her last words to George, it alters as if she’s gone back in time, to the high-pitched voice of a girl. “I said: ‘Oh George, are you leaving me? Where you going?’ He told me to find Charles and Katherine and tell them he was taken away.
“I never saw him again until he was in his casket,” said Aime. “That is something I will always see in my memories. His face was burned.”